Saturday, April 13, 2019

Pucks Mischief Essay Example for Free

Pucks whimsicality EssayPuck may be pestiferous, but he is not cruel or evil. Do you agree? I agree to a large extent that although Puck may be mischievous and playful, it does not mean that he is inherently cruel and evil. Mischievousness, implies a sort of roguish fondness for mischief-making and pranks, this however does not necessarily dictate that Puck is evil at heart. At the discloseset, the first fancy the auditory modality receives of Puck is that of a merry prankster and not a hard-hearted plotter who wishes ill. The first queen mole rat the audience meets describes Puck as a shrewd and knavish sprite referring directly to his mischievous spirit. The fairy describes Pucks pranks of making the drink to bear no barm and Puck himself talks about how he jests to Oberon, and makes him smile and even pretends to be a stool only to disappear when hotshot wants to sit altogether of which though they may sometimes be unkind, do not mean any serious reproach. olibanum from the beginning, Shakespeargon creates the embossment of a character that delights in mischief, but does not go out of his way to harm people.though Puck catalyses the conflict between the completers, it is not because of evil intent that he does this. In fact if anyone should be deemed cruel or evil in A Midsummer Nights Dream, it should be Oberon. As it was due to carrying out Oberons orders, Puck caused the confusion amongst the lovers seen in Act 3 Scene 2. It is doubt slight that Puck was indeed the one who anoints Lysanders eyes instead of Demetrius, causing Lysander to pursue Helena to honourher and be her knight, creating a tangle of lovers when all four finally meet in Act 3 Scene 2. However, he does this obliviously, as seen in how he later admits that he had mistook Lysander for Demetrius because Oberon identified Demetrius by the Athenian garments he hath on. Thus going to represent that he had no intention of causing the trouble he did. Additionally, he is willin g to make mending for the trouble he has caused, showing that he meant no permanent harm.After finding out that he had laid the love juice on some true-loves sight causing a true love to turnd false, by causing Lysander to fall for Helena, he immediately commits himself to being swifter than an arrow from tartars bow in meddling for Helena to make things right. Later he honestly admits his mistake to Oberon, pleading Oberon King of shadows to believe him that he mistook. Thus by willingly admitting his mistake and swiftly making amends, Puck shows that he had no intent to harm the lovers at all, shedding light on his character that he is not intrinsically evil.Furthermore, Puck shows benevolence for the lovers in his actions, revealing a somewhat unexpected benevolent nature. This is seen when he mistakes Lysanders reason for sleeping so far from Hermia as lacking-love and courtesy. He echoes similar sentiments when he comments that Cupid is a knavish lad, Thus to make wretched females mad at the end of all the chaos of Act 3 Scene 2. Similarly, although Puck leads Demetrius and Lysander Up and down, up and down, seeming to goad them, he does so for good reason- in order to lead them out-of-door from each other to prevent a fight.Hence through these instances, Puck shows himself to be even less of the hot-headed mischief maker. However, Puck does show a streak of cruelty in his dealings with the craftsmen. His attitude to the craftsmen and buns in particular is scornful, calling them the shallowest thicksin of that barren sort. This conflicts with the audiences previous encounters with the craftsmen, which though show them to be shallow they are certainly not barren, and The Most Lamentable Comedy and Most Cruel Death of Pyramus and Thisbe they persevered in practicing is create of this.Thus Puck comes across here as very caustic and snide, which may lead the audience to think of him as a wicked character. He even gloats to Oberon about how he had An as ss noll fixed on Bottoms head, which reveals a certain malicious streak in him. Nonetheless, Pucks conclusion of the play emphasizes that he promoter no ill will. In his closing statement, he says to the audience that If you pardon, we shall amend, for he is an honest Puck. Highlighting yet over again that although he may delight in and make a sport out of mischief, he means no real injury, for he is no cruel fairy.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.